Invesco Canada blog

Insights, commentary and investing expertise

Kristina Hooper | August 3, 2021

A closer look at the Chinese tech sell-off

Surprise regulations on for-profit tutors led to a broad sell-off in Chinese equities — and attractive valuations for Chinese tech stocks, says Kristina Hooper.

I often use this blog as an opportunity to answer pressing questions from clients. And recently, it seems almost all the questions we are getting are about China – what is going on with Chinese stocks and whether investors should abandon them. The catalyst for these recent jitters: Last week, Chinese regulators surprised markets by publishing regulations requiring tutoring service providers to be run as not-for-profit entities. This triggered a substantial sell-off across Chinese equities.  

What prompted these regulations?

First of all, I think it’s important to understand the rationale for China’s decision on for-profit educational businesses. Currently, it is very expensive for Chinese families to utilize tutors to help their children perform well during their compulsory years of education, but many families view it as a necessity to help their children succeed academically and be accepted at a highly regarded university.

The Chinese government recognizes that this places a significant and unfair burden on families – and may be a hindrance to China’s goal of encouraging couples to have larger families. China recognizes that it is in the best interest of the country that all its children have equal access to educational opportunities. It’s clear that the Chinese government is willing to tolerate short-term volatility in order to achieve longer-term goals.

It’s understandable that this regulation of the for-profit education industry, which includes the banning of foreign investors, would exert downward pressure on stocks in that industry. However, the reaction was far more broad-based: Chinese tech stocks and Chinese equities, in general, sold off indiscriminately. I suspect it’s because this decision follows on the heels of a series of other regulatory decisions in recent months that impacted other industries.

The objective of these regulatory actions is not to drive foreign investors from China – or for China to undermine its market economy. Rather, authorities seem to be doing what other countries have only talked about doing in terms of addressing issues that have arisen in recent years:

  • Financial stability: China wants to ensure adequate risk controls for financial services companies, including sufficient capitalization.
  • Data protection: Data security is an important issue for all companies and consumers, but countries have done little to protect data. Chinese policymakers believe data security is a national security issue, and as such, do not want foreign entities to have access to Chinese companies’ data.
  • Break-up of tech monopolies: Authorities are concerned that some companies may gain an unfair ability to set higher prices because they control an industry. They also want to ensure that smaller businesses are not at a disadvantage when competing.
  • Better conditions for workers: China wants to ensure “gig workers” receive adequate treatment from employers, including earning a living wage and receiving health benefits.
  • Combating climate change: The government wants to support a “greening” of the economy.

China seeks to calm investor fears

The Chinese government showed that investors matter by quickly pulling together a meeting last week between Chinese regulators and brokerage firms to help explain its most recent decision and to assuage fears.

China Securities Regulatory Commission Vice Chairman Fang Xinghai reassured participants that Chinese companies will still be allowed to go public in the United States as long as they meet criteria set out by the Chinese government for listing. That doesn’t mean we won’t see more regulation going forward, as authorities think strategically about the longer term, but I would expect it to be targeted and based on China’s focus on achieving higher-level goals.

My takeaway from this situation is that many Chinese equities, especially Chinese tech companies, have been unfairly punished by investors as a result of recent regulatory actions. However, that has created more attractive valuations. As of July 30, the trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio on the MSCI China Index is 18.86, which compares favourably to that of the MSCI World Index at 26.071.

Rather than abandoning Chinese tech companies, I believe this is an opportunity for investors to look for buying opportunities, albeit through a discerning lens.

1 Source: Bloomberg L.P as of July 30, 2021

More from Kristina Hooper

Have Omicron and the U.S. Federal Reserve changed our 2022 outlook?
January 18, 2022

Markets react to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s hawkish turn
January 11, 2022

Market predictions and investment resolutions for 2022
January 4, 2022

We don’t anticipate ‘stagflation’ in the U.S. in 2022. Here’s why.
December 13, 2021

2022 Investment Outlook: Assessing the path ahead
December 6, 2021

Investors grapple with uncertainty as Omicron rattles markets
November 29, 2021

Five reasons not to be fearful of inflation
November 15, 2021

On the path to normal
November 8, 2021

Nine things for investors to watch this week
November 2, 2021

How much pessimism is too much?
October 25, 2021

Understanding inflation expectations and why they matter
October 18, 2021

How much will supply chain issues weigh on earnings season?
October 12, 2021

After an awful month for stocks, what’s in store for October?
October 4, 2021

What’s next in the evolving Evergrande situation?
September 28, 2021

What to watch this week: The U.S. Federal Reserve FOMC and Evergrande
September 20, 2021

Markets look for a foothold to climb the ‘wall of worry’
September 13, 2021

Destined for a downturn? I say the economy can weather this storm.
September 7, 2021

Powell reassures markets that the U.S. Federal Reserve won’t rush rate hikes
August 30, 2021

As COVID cases rise, will U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Powell address tapering?
August 23, 2021

The U.S. Federal Reserve’s foreshadowing may help avoid another ‘taper tantrum’
August 16, 2021

Subscribe to the blog


Do you want to subscribe in French?

Subscribe to receive e-mails from Invesco Canada Ltd. about this blog. To unsubscribe, please e-mail blog@invesco.ca or contact us.

Important information

NA5826

Header image: xijian / Getty

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses may all be associated with mutual fund investments. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Please read the simplified prospectus before investing. Copies are available from your advisor or from Invesco Canada Ltd.

The MSCI China Index captures large- and mid-cap representation across China H shares, B shares, Red chips, P chips, and foreign listings (e.g., ADRs). With 495 constituents, the index covers about 85% of this China equity universe. Currently, the index also includes Large Cap A shares represented at 10% of their free-float-adjusted market capitalization.

The MSCI World Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of stocks of developed countries.

The price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio measures a stock’s valuation by dividing its share price by its earnings per share.

Investments in companies located or operating in Greater China are subject to the following risks: nationalization, expropriation, or confiscation of property, difficulty in obtaining and/or enforcing judgments, alteration or discontinuation of economic reforms, military conflicts, and China’s dependency on the economies of other Asian countries, many of which are developing countries.

Many products and services offered in technology-related industries are subject to rapid obsolescence, which may lower the value of the issuers.

This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.

The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of Aug. 2, 2021. These comments should not be construed as recommendations but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.

The risks of investing in securities of foreign issuers, including emerging market issuers, can include fluctuations in foreign currencies, political and economic instability, and foreign taxation issues.