Invesco Canada blog

Insights, commentary and investing expertise

Kristina Hooper | April 6, 2020

Where do portfolio managers see opportunities in today’s environment?

The three-pronged fight against COVID-19 and its economic impact continues. Central banks are providing monetary policy support to keep banks and markets functioning, national governments are providing fiscal policy support to consumers and businesses, and governments at all levels are taking public health policy steps to contain the spread of the virus. (Not to mention the tireless dedication of the health care workers on the front lines and the scientists searching for treatments and vaccines.)

 

Of course, each policy decision in this fight has consequences for stocks, bonds, commodities, and other asset classes, and investors are wondering how to position their portfolios in such an environment. This is something that I discuss with Invesco’s portfolio managers on a regular basis. Today, I’ve collected some highlights from them to share. Below, we hear from:

 

  • Scott Wolle, Head of Systematic and Factor Investing
  • Meggan Walsh, Senior Portfolio Manager and Head of the Dividend Value team
  • Matt Brill, Head of U.S. Investment Grade for Invesco Fixed Income

 

Risk parity: Focusing on economic diversification
 
Scott Wolle: The market movements we’ve witnessed over the past few weeks have been truly breathtaking. Investors could be forgiven for thinking that this crisis feels similar to the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2008 – because the speed and magnitude of the current decline is reminiscent of the one that unfolded after the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in September of that year. This is due to the fact that we’re essentially dealing with three crises at the same time: 1) the fundamental decline in economic activity related to the response to the virus; 2) an oil price war between the Saudis and Russians; and 3) a credit crunch based on banks’ inability to provide liquidity to the system. Policymakers are, of course, trying to address each of these but still have much work to do.

 

None of us knows how long we’ll be dealing with the coronavirus and its aftermath, and that’s really the type of situation that we believe increases the appeal of risk parity. Risk parity is a strategy based on economic diversification, in which a portfolio manager invests in stocks, bonds, and commodities – but weights the allocations so that each asset class contributes an equal amount of risk to the portfolio. This means that the performance of a single asset class doesn’t overshadow the others in terms of overall portfolio return, which allows investors to participate in up markets and play defense in down markets.

 

We are confident that discipline and diversification will be crucial ingredients for navigating the next few months. These are hallmarks of the risk parity approach, and it’s how my team managed portfolios during the GFC, the Euro crisis, the 2014-15 oil crash and other challenging environments. One of the virtues of systematic processes is that they help to keep you on track when human nature tempts you to panic.

 

Dividend value stocks: Corporate balance sheets matter
 
Meggan Walsh: Dividend-paying stocks can play an important role in a portfolio, providing capital appreciation potential and current income. The substantial disruption to economic activity caused by the coronavirus outbreak, and the uncertain duration of this disruption, has caused investors to question the ability of corporations to maintain dividend payouts to shareholders. Indeed, market participants are now forecasting a very sharp decline in earnings estimates in the second quarter of 2020, and there is the potential for dividend payout ratios to be reduced in some industries, particularly those more tied to cyclical end markets, look to improve liquidity and preserve capital during this difficult environment.

 

In this environment, it’s important to note that dividend investing is not about simply finding the highest yields: Investors also need to pay attention to a company’s balance sheet. Often, high dividend yielding stocks can be quite volatile and may indicate that a company is facing challenges. In these cases, dividend cuts have been quite common. The challenge is to differentiate between an ailing company that is simply paying a higher yield, and a strong, dividend-paying company with a solid capital structure, earnings power, and the ability to return capital to shareholders. For my team, our fundamental research process begins with the balance sheet, emphasizing firms with sound capital structures that are less prone to capital stress in cyclical downturns.

 

It is too early to estimate what the path of earnings recovery will look like, but history tells us to expect dividend payout ratios to grow again as the profit backdrop normalizes.  Of note, as of March 31, the S&P 500 Index’s dividend payout ratio is still below its long-term average.1

 

Investment grade bonds: The Fed provides critical market support
 
Matt Brill: As Kristina mentioned at the start of this piece, monetary policy support is critical for supporting markets in this environment. And the U.S. Federal Reserve’s recently announced programs have helped to stabilize high-quality bond markets – including the investment grade debt market. In particular, the Fed announced on March 23 that it would begin purchasing corporate bonds for the first time in history. I believe this is a complete game-changer, and I wouldn’t underestimate its potential impact.

 

As liquidity became very challenged in mid-March, the investment grade market saw a fall-off in buyers. Bid-ask spreads (the difference between the highest price that a buyer is willing to pay for a bond and the lowest price that a seller is willing to accept) widened to levels not seen since the global financial crisis. In some cases, there were no bids for even high-quality, short-term paper. That’s when the Fed stepped in as a buyer. Since that March 23 announcement – even before the Fed has made any actual purchases – liquidity has returned to near-normal levels. Bid-ask spreads remain wider than they typically are in “normal markets,” but investors now seem to view that as a buying opportunity given the Fed’s commitment to support functioning markets.

 

We realize U.S. economic data will be very negative in the near term, but I believe we are experiencing a potential opportunity in the investment grade market – a rally that I believe has substantial support from the major catalyst of Fed purchases.

 

 

 

More from Kristina Hooper

Nations pledge trillions in fiscal stimulus to boost their economies
June 1, 2020

A case study in lowering unemployment: The Work Projects Administration
May 27, 2020

U.S.-China tensions could be the biggest risk to U.S. stocks this year
May 19, 2020

Portfolio managers examine the impact of COVID-19
May 14, 2020

Low-wage job losses fuel the U.S. stimulus debate
May 11, 2020

Global Markets: What to watch for in May
May 4, 2020

As the U.S. passes more stimulus, disagreements loom on what comes next
April 27, 2020

Tracking China’s recovery and a dire U.S. earnings season
April 20, 2020

As earnings season looms, portfolio managers look for long-term opportunity
April 16, 2020

Trade, stimulus, and politics: What matters to markets this week
April 13, 2020

Six things for investors to watch in April
April 6, 2020

Where do portfolio managers see opportunities in today’s environment?
April 6, 2020

Where do stocks and bonds go from here?
March 30, 2020

Coronavirus impact and response: A global view
March 24, 2020

Could the surge in market volatility signal the end of the current market cycle?
March 10, 2020

As markets struggle, where do global economies go from here?
March 2, 2020

Recent data reveal the economic impact of coronavirus
February 24, 2020

The market impact of coronavirus has begun to spread
February 18, 2020

Three key takeaways from the Fed’s Monetary Policy Report
February 10, 2020

Three issues that could keep global markets reeling
February 3, 2020

Subscribe to the blog

Subscribe to receive notifications for: *


Do you want to subscribe in French?

Subscribe to receive e-mails from Invesco Canada Ltd. about this blog. To unsubscribe, please e-mail blog@invesco.ca or contact us.

1 Source: NYU Stern. Long-term average calculated from 1960.

Important Information

Blog header image: Credit: Samxmeg/ Getty

Diversification does not guarantee a profit or eliminate the risk of loss.
The opinions referenced above are those of the authors as of April 2, 2020. These comments should not be construed as recommendations, but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.